Resume-first hiring optimizes for storytelling. Competency-based hiring optimizes for performance. When your teams are remote and distributed across time zones, the cost of a mis-hire goes up, and so does the value of selecting people for how they think, decide, and deliver. This post breaks down the business case, the core mechanics, and a simple rollout plan you can apply immediately.
1) The resume trap: high noise, low signal
- Brand bias: Famous company logos masquerade as proof of skill.
- Title inflation: Senior-sounding roles ≠ senior behaviors.
- Unequal polish: Great doers can be average self-promoters (and vice versa).
- Inconsistent evaluation: Unstructured interviews reward charisma over competence.
Result: higher variance in performance, slower ramp-up, fragile teams.
2) Why competency-based hiring works (in practice)
- Clarity: Define the few behaviors that predict success in this role.
- Evidence: Use work samples and scenarios to see those behaviors in action.
- Consistency: Structured interviews + rubrics reduce noise and bias.
- Fit-for-work: Candidates are matched to the work they’ll actually do, improving ramp and retention.
What improves: signal quality, forecastability of performance, team reliability.
3) The four competencies most teams under-assess
- Ownership – Does the candidate move work forward without perfect inputs?
- Communication – Are they clear, concise, and audience-aware (written + spoken)?
- Problem-solving – Can they diagnose, prioritize, and choose trade-offs deliberately?
- Adaptability – Do they adjust when constraints or goals change?
(You’ll tailor technical/domain skills per role, but these four drive day-to-day execution).
4) The hiring mechanics (what to actually do)
A) Define success (15 minutes):
Write 5–7 competencies + behaviors. Example for a Customer Success role:
- Ownership: closes loops without reminders.
- Comm: translates technical issues for non-technical users.
- Problem-solving: segments issues, proposes tiers/SLAs.
- Empathy: de-escalates with tone control and next steps.
B) Design a work sample (60–90 minutes to create, 45 minutes to complete):
- CS example: triage 10 tickets, write 2 client replies, propose an escalation SOP.
- Finance example: analyze a small data set, deliver a 5-line executive memo.
- EA example: clean a messy calendar + write an inbox triage SOP.
C) Run a structured interview (30–45 minutes):
Behavioral prompts mapped to competencies (use STAR follow-ups). Score on a 1–5 rubric.
D) Score with a rubric (10 minutes per candidate):
- 1: superficial/hand-wavy
- 3: acceptable, misses some nuance
- 5: precise, replicable, trade-offs explained
E) Decide on evidence, not vibes:
Aggregate rubric scores + work sample performance = pass/hold/decline.
5) Example mini-rubric (for “Ownership”)
1 – Waits for direction; misses follow-ups
3 – Closes tasks with reminders; flags blockers
5 – Anticipates needs; proposes next steps; documents for others to reuse
(Do the same for Communication, Problem-solving, Adaptability, and your technical skill.)
6) The business impact (what to track)
- Time-to-productivity: days to independent work on core tasks
- Quality rate: defects per unit (or error rate)
- Throughput: volume completed per week at standard quality
- Manager load: hours/week spent unblocking or re-doing work
- Early retention (90-180 days): % still in role and meeting expectations
When hiring inputs improve, these metrics move in the right direction, consistently.
7) 30-60-90 rollout plan (start small, standardize fast)
Days 1–30 (Pilot)
- Pick 1 role → define 5–7 competencies
- Create 1 work sample + 8–10 structured interview questions
- Hire 2–3 roles using the new process
Days 31–60 (Standardize)
- Refine rubric language (calibrate with interviewers)
- Add a short writing prompt to test clarity (async-friendly)
- Start tracking four metrics (above)
Days 61–90 (Scale)
- Train interviewers on scorecards; eliminate unstructured chats
- Build a small library of role-specific work samples
- Expand to 2–3 additional roles; run a monthly calibration review
8) Do / Don’t (the cultural piece)
Do
- Share competencies with candidates before interviews
- Time-box assignments; keep them relevant and humane
- Offer feedback snippets so talent can improve
Don’t
- Use unpaid, company-specific work at production depth
- Over-index on “culture fit” (code for “like me”)
- Confuse speed for ownership; look for follow-through
Bottom line: Competency-based hiring is not an HR fad: it’s an operating system. Define the behaviors that matter, test them the same way for everyone, and hire the people who consistently demonstrate them. Better inputs. Better teams.


No responses yet